The Cabinet meeting approved the decision to support the five-year-old boy who suffers from physical disabilities since his birth. He recently returned to Nepal from San Francisco after a medical tour which was supported by the Nepal Government.
The Nepal Government favoring Aditya has certainly questioned the transparency and public governance in terms of social welfare.
After the decision, people have taken their frustration to social media where they are raising voices aginst the decision.
Why should Aditya's foundation be supported by the government ? He is not a star nor a social personality who has contributed to the society. The government's decision of helping the foundation certainly highlights a lack of transparency and vision.
People have been questioning the government about the decision. The reality is if the government starts to donate 10 million to every foundation like this, There are more than 1000 foundations registered which are genuinely working for the cause.
What would be an impact for those organization who are working for the cause, shouldn't they all be getting the same amount ?
Posts
