Terrorists and suicide bombers are also humans but what
makes them so brutal that pushes them towards killing hundreds that too without
guilt is a question of amazement.
Even hurting yourself it pains but hurting someone else
is a matter that lights the self conscious mind that neglects the moral values and
human existence. These people are beyond the thinking of possibilities as
anything is possible for them.
I call these people abnormal brain function who on their
cost don’t feel liable to others. For a normal mind the pros and cons of
any action is calculated which direct in the modality of action, but for a
abnormal mind that functions with high testosterone and adrenaline it’s a matter
of what can be done rather than what can be saved.
The major core values like learning, pain, action storage and thinking are place in different segment of minds. Out of all these process it works under basic fundamental values of ethics and morals. For any human to hurt another person it has to be overwritten manually to discharge the possible thinking for action of destruction of others. Just like every equal action has an alternative reaction the brains also function with a basic function of alternative theory.
The major core values like learning, pain, action storage and thinking are place in different segment of minds. Out of all these process it works under basic fundamental values of ethics and morals. For any human to hurt another person it has to be overwritten manually to discharge the possible thinking for action of destruction of others. Just like every equal action has an alternative reaction the brains also function with a basic function of alternative theory.
Holonomic
brain theory says the cognitive function as being guided by a matrix of
neurological wave interference patterns situated temporally between holographic
Gestalt perception and discrete, effective, quantum vectors derived from reward
anticipation potentials.
Anything that exceeds normal human brain is abnormal
function that search and values action in terms of time and situation. For any
action to be diverted towards a wrong action it takes huge need of will,
motivation and inspiration. These three action in combination result in
anything that is possible to overshadowing the motive of cognitive process and
values.
Criminologists in the
nineteenth and early twentieth centuries turned to phrenology, criminal
anthropology, evolutionary theory, intelligence tests, and analyses of body
types to understand crime in a manner that reified the differences between
criminals and non-criminals. Adopting a "medical model" of crime,
they focused on the physical traits that they believed distinguished criminals
and largely ignored the circumstances in which criminals lived. Most
early biocriminologists tried to reduce "the complexities of criminal
behavior to a single biological factor," such as the size of the frontal
lobes of the brain, the shape of the skull, or the capacity to learn (243).
Most of them were also convinced that biology was destiny. They believed that
interactions between biology and the environment played little, if any, role in
shaping the behavior of criminals. Given their assumptions, it is not
surprising that many biocriminologists embraced eugenics, since they believed
that criminals represented a lower, atavistic state of human evolution. Nor is
it surprising that behavioral scientists lost interest in biological
explanations of crime once they had witnessed the atrocities committed by the
Nazis and other eugenicists in the name of biocriminology.”